Why M&A's failure is a topic of key strategic relevance Dissertation

Why M&As failure is a topic of gravestone strategic relevance - Dissertation ExampleOn the other hand, external factors include the actual merchandise condition where the cross border mergers and acquisition took place, the actual market competition that happens within the industry level, and the berth of government intervention through policies and regulations. Specifically the case of SAIC was unique as compared to the British Aerospace (BAe), BMW and Phoenix pool is because the company decided to create business alliance with MG scouter through joint-venture method quite an than acquisition method. Since SAIC agreed to enter into joint-venture arrangement with MG scouter, the company (SAIC) was able to free itself from the risk of having to allocate MG Rovers debt obligations. Table of content Executive Summary ................................................................ 2 Table of Contents .................................................................... 3 I. Intr oduction 5 a. Case Study Overview ............................................... 6 a.1 Historical Background of MG Rover . 6 a.... .................................................. 14 III. investigate Methodology .. 17 a. Primary Research Method ....... 17 a.1 object lens Interviewees .......................... 20 a.2 Site of the Research Study .. 21 b. Secondary Research Method ......... 21 IV. Research Findings and Analysis .. 22 a. Internal Factors that Promotes a Failed Merger and Acquisition ............................................ 23 a.1 Unclear or indefinable Organizational Vision and Mission ..................................... 23 a.2 The Presence of Cultural Clashes Resulting to Organizational Miscommunication ..................................... 24 a.4 Lack of caper Integration ...................... 26 b. External Factors that Promotes a Failed Merger and Acquisition ............................................ 29 b.1 Market Condition ........................ ................ 30 b.2 Market Competition within the Industry ...... 31 b.3 Government Policies and Regulations ....... 33 V. finis and Recommendations . 36 a. Conclusion .............................................................. 36 a.1 MG Rover and the British Aerospace (BAe) . 36 a.2 MG Rover and BMW ................................... 38 a.3 MG Rover and Phoenix .............................. 41 a.4 MG Rover and SAIC ................................... 44 b. Recommendations ............................................. 44 Appendix I Historical Timeline of MG Rover .. 47 Appendix II Semi-Structured Interview Questionnaire . 48 Appendix III Reasons why BAe, BMW,